Skip to main content

Reproductive genetic carrier screening

Reproductive genetic carrier screening: A tool for reproductive decision-making


Couple-based reproductive genetic carrier screening is an accessible and effective method of reproductive decision making, according to a recent study published in the New England Journal of Medicine.1

Childhood-onset autosomal recessive and X-linked conditions have been linked to over 2500 genes, with most parents carrying these genes only learning about their carrier status after childbirth. Reproductive decision making may be improved through the use of reproductive genetic carrier screening.

The availability of reproductive genetic carrier screening has been improved by commercial providers, but health care professionals must remain aware about how to best offer screening and how their patients may view this option.

This critical information has been detailed by the Australian Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening Project.2 The project included over 10,000 reproductive couples and provided reproductive genetic carrier screening for at least 1281 genes.

Investigators conducted a study to evaluate screening uptake, the rate of couples with an increased risk of having an affected child, reproductive decisions, psychosocial outcomes, and screening acceptability.1 Participating health care centers offered free reproductive genetic carrier screening to their patients.

Reproductive couple included 2 individuals of the opposite sex who were the genetic parents in pregnancy. Those in the analysis were aged 18 years or older and planning to conceive or at under 10 weeks’ gestation. Demographic data was obtained from participants at enrollment.

The panel covered 1300 genes linked to 750 childhood-onset autosomal recessive or X-linked conditions. Most of these conditions had available treatment, but this treatment was often limited in availability or burdensome. After revision, 1281 genes were included in the final panel.

Autosomal genes were assessed in male and female partners while X-linked genes were only assessed in female partners. Exome sequencing and a targeted gene panel were used during testing.

Increased risks were determined based on the presence of a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in the same autosomal gene across both partners and a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in an X-linked gene for the female partner. When these criteria were not met, the odds were considered “low chance.”

Participants with an increased risk of having an offspring with a genetic condition received genetic counseling, with referral to a subspecialist given when necessary. During genetic counseling, participants were told about reproductive options available through the study.

Reproductive genetic carrier screening was given to 9107 couples. Couples who were invited to participate but did not undergo screening were more often residing in the most socioeconomic disadvantaged area, had a lower education level, and had 2 or more children.

Low odds of having a child with a genetic condition were reported in 96.1% of couples who received reproductive genetic carrier screening, while new identification of an increased chance was reported in 1.9% and knowledge prior to screening in 2%. Of the 180 couples with knowledge prior to the screening, 4 learned about an increased risk of a different condition.

Having previously been assumed to have the same level of risk as the general population before screening was reported in 78.3% of couples with a newly identified risk. The remaining 21.7% had family history or consanguinity leading them to be considered at an increased risk.

Of newly identified couples with current pregnancy when receiving the result, 64% had the fetus genetically tested, with 24 of these 29 couples receiving normal test results. In impacted pregnancy was found in 5, with 4 deciding to terminate the pregnancy.

Sixteen of the newly identified couples did not elect to receive testing. Of these, 1 had a miscarriage, 2 had babies with a condition identified in genetic screening after birth, 4 had unaffected babies, 4 had ongoing pregnancy during the assessment, and 5 had unknown outcomes.

These results highlighted the efficacy and availability of providing reproductive genetic carrier screening to a diverse population. Investigators noted reproductive genetic carrier screening is acceptable for patients and providers when delivered using this method.

carrier screening, genetic testing, reproductive health, inherited disorders, preconception care, prenatal testing, family planning, genetic counseling, rare diseases, autosomal recessive, X-linked disorders, carrier status, cystic fibrosis, thalassemia, Tay-Sachs disease, sickle cell anemia, genetic risk, next-generation sequencing, personalized medicine

#CarrierScreening, #GeneticTesting, #ReproductiveHealth, #InheritedDisorders, #PreconceptionCare, #PrenatalTesting, #FamilyPlanning, #GeneticCounseling, #RareDiseases, #AutosomalRecessive, #XLinkedDisorders, #CarrierStatus, #CysticFibrosis, #Thalassemia, #TaySachsDisease, #SickleCellAnemia, #GeneticRisk, #NGS, #PersonalizedMedicine, #ReproductiveGenetics

International Conference on Genetics and Genomics of Diseases 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Genetics role in ovarian cancer

The Medical Minute: Genetics play big role in ovarian cancer In 2024, about 19,680 women in the United States will receive a new diagnosis of ovarian cancer and 12,740 women will die from the disease, said Dr. Shaina Bruce , a gynecologic oncologist at Penn State Cancer Institute . The median age of all patients who develop ovarian cancer is 63. Historically, women at increased risk for ovarian cancer are recommended to have their fallopian tubes and ovaries removed when they have completed having children. Taking that step to protect themselves comes at a heavy price ― surgical menopause. But Bruce said medical science is catching up with ovarian cancer. Studies could lead to new methods for preventative care and the surgery needed to lower risk may be easier than it once was. Below, during Gynecologic Cancer Awareness Month, Bruce discusses the disease and why acting to reduce your risk is worth it. What’s the connection between heredity and ovarian cancer? About 25% of all cases of ...

X chromosome

Gene on the X chromosome may help explain high multiple sclerosis rates in women Brain inflammation may be fueled by a gene on the X chromosome, a new study in mice suggests. And in female mice, who carry two X chromosomes, a diabetes drug called metformin may work to counteract that inflammation. If these findings bear out in later studies, they could help to unravel the long-standing mystery of why women, who have two copies of this inflammation-driving gene, are more prone to certain autoimmune diseases, particularly after menopause. A disparity between the sexes Our bodies are patrolled by immune cells that provide protection against bacteria and viruses, but sometimes, these defenses turn on us. In the autoimmune disorder multiple sclerosis (MS), for instance, the immune system attacks myelin, the fatty insulation surrounding the nerve fibers in the brain and spinal cord. This leads to symptoms such as muscle weakness and difficulty walking, as well issues with memory and thinking...

Multifactorial Genetic Conditions

Multifactorial Genetic Conditions Multifactorial genetic conditions are disorders caused by the combined effects of multiple genes and environmental factors , rather than a single gene mutation . These conditions do not follow classic Mendelian inheritance patterns and instead result from complex gene–environment interactions . Factors such as lifestyle, nutrition, infections, stress, and exposure to toxins can significantly influence disease onset and severity in genetically susceptible individuals. Common examples include diabetes, cardiovascular diseases , neural tube defects, asthma, and many neuropsychiatric disorders. Understanding multifactorial inheritance is essential for risk prediction, preventive medicine, and personalized healthcare strategies. Multifactorial inheritance, polygenic traits, gene–environment interaction, complex diseases, genetic susceptibility, environmental risk factors, non-Mendelian inheritance, disease predisposition, polygenic risk score, precision ...